Labels

Abortion Allah America ancient anti-feminism Apostle Arab Arabia Aristotle Augustine autobiography bank banking beliefs Bhudda Bible biblical bigot bigotry biography Buddha Day Buddhism canon catholic Catholicism character charisma children christian christianity Christmas church Cinema civilization clutter commentary compromise conflict controversy conversion convert courtship creed crisis Crito culture custody dating debate deed democracy dhamma dharma dialogue differences diversity divorce dukkha Eastern Orthodoxy economics elections elephant esoteric essay ethics ethnicity Evangelical Evangelism extremism extremist fable faith family fatwa feminism fiction Folk four noble truths friends fringe Fun Gandha Baba gender generosity Giri Bala; Babaji global studies gnostic God golden rule good goodness Gorgias Gospel greed hadith hate Hebrew Bible heretic Hinduism hoarding Holiday home I AM ibn Baz idiom idols individuality initiative insurance interest interfaith interpretation interracial Iranaeus Iraq islam Israel Israeli jannah Jesus Jesus freak Jesus movement Jew jihad Judaism jurisprudence kids Kindness knowledge Kriya Yoga language law liberal liberals life Life of Pi love manners Mark marriage meaning Mecca meditation mess Middle East miracle Mission moderation Mohammed monastery money monk movie Muratorian muslim myth mythology Native American New Years opinion opportunity Padre Pio pagan Palestine pastor path Paul Paula Fredriksen pay it forward peace perception perennialist personality philosophy Pink Floyd Plato polite politeness politics pro-choice pro-life progressive proof Protestant proto-orthodox proverbs psychology Qaradawi Qur'an reincarnation relationship religion repentance respect responsibility retrospection revert review Rick Santorum rights rules Saint sala salvation science scripture secrets semantics sermon shari'a sharia shrine shura sin Socrates Soroush spirituality St. Theresa of Avila Strangers stuff Subculture Symposium tact Tanakh Tariq Ramadan temple terrorism terrorist Thanksgiving theology Theravada Therese Neumann tradition translation turkey understanding universalism USA values Vesak Visakha Puja wisdom women Xenophon Yogananda Yogi zealot
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Evangelicalism - American’s Folk Religion and Subculture



In Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory (1), Randall Balmer presents a picture in which Evangelicalism is a subculture within America, while also referring to it as “America’s folk religion”. Folk religion is defined as “religion which occurs in small, local communities which does not adhere to the norms of large systems” or as “the appropriation of religious beliefs and practices at a popular level” in the Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions (2).  Evangelicalism as described in Balmer’s book fits these descriptions as he shows the reader that evangelicalism is not a unified system that is the same across the nation, rather there is much diversity, not only in practice, but in thought (3). In the epilogue, Balmer opines that it is the popular appeal that better explains evangelicalism than the popular reference to a “mosaic” (4). Balmer visited eighteen different centers of evangelicalism across the nation and each one differed from another, although they held some commonalities, such as a personal conversion experience, the importance (and typically, infallibility) of scripture, and the expectation of an impending apocalypse (5).

Throughout the book, be frequently referred to the evangelical subculture in America, by subculture, I believe he meant that evangelicals across the nations, although varied in form, exhibit cultural norms that are not part of the wider American culture. They are a sub-set that can easily be identified because of their behavior and beliefs. It is often evangelicals’ literal interpretation of the bible that gives way to a list of rules that a “true” Christian (6)  must follow after being born-again that sets them apart as a subset of American culture, but also sets them apart from other Christian groups, like Roman Catholics (7).  Balmer includes conservative Protestants: fundamentalists, charismatics, and Pentecostals in his study of evangelicalism (8).

Typically, these groups all eschew modernity – not modernity in the sense of technology (here they follow previous evangelical innovators like Whitfield and Finney) – but in morality (9). In fact, several of the groups that Balmer interviewed/studied made great use of some of America’s modern marvels (Radio, Television and Cinema, and the Internet) to aid the spread of evangelicalism. Some ways in which they spurn modernity include rules about modest dress (10), the role of women at home and in the church (11), their firm views on reproductive rights (anti-abortion) (12), and their anti-evolution/pro-creationist agenda in the school system (13).

Evangelicals also exhibit some behaviors that tend to identify them as such: conservative dress; use of certain phrases like “on fire for the lord” (14) and talking about being “saved”; campaigning or generally supportive of republican or conservative candidates; anti-abortion efforts; emotional outbursts in church or when discussing religion; avoidance of “worldly” things like modern music (unless it is contemporary Christian Music); avoidance of alcohol, adherence to traditional gender roles; and a view that homosexuality is sinful (15).

As with any culture, the evangelical subculture has made contributions to the world in areas like education, music, art, and politics. Grassroot evangelical movements have been responsible for the creation of several Bible Schools, Colleges, and Universities over the years, as Balmer’s study indicates (Biola University and Temple University, to name a couple) (16).


US Governors Map, January 2013 (Wiki)
Politically, evangelicals can consider themselves responsible for the election of Ronald Reagan in the 1980s (17) and for the rise in votes for republicans as a whole. It is because of evangelicals that a war is frequently forged against women’s reproductive rights and who make the pro-choice camp nervous and worried of a return to the old days of back-alley coat hanger jobs (18). They are certainly a force to be reckoned with if our red/blue maps are any indication.

In the form of art contributions, we find the visual artist, Thomas Kinkade, who paints scenes that evoke certain wistful emotions and are considered not surreal, but unreal by Balmer (19). The paintings are meant to be a window into an idealized world – perhaps a window into a heaven-like beauty in which “true” Christians hope to find themselves one day. Another art form has been hugely influential on the spread of evangelicalism: music.


A still from Jesus Christ Superstar
As Balmer points out in chapter sixteen, the evangelical music scene was fairly static from inception until the 1960s, when it exploded (14). David Stowe brought this explosion into focus for us in class while he lectured on his book, No Sympathy for the Devil. He not only explained that the hippie generation, which was already heavily involved in the enjoyment of music, became a huge part of the evangelical scene when they found Jesus and converted into Jesus Freaks, rather than just hippies. He played some key songs for us so that we could get a taste for the sound and the words of worship and calling within the music. Voices of the time included: Love Song, Children of the Day, Barry McGuire, Bob Dylan, Larry Norman, Rez Band, the Jesus Christ Superstar musical and soundtrack, Billy Preston, Andrae Crouch, Edward Hawkins Singers, Elvis, Marvin Gaye, Stevie Wonder, Aretha Franklin, Johnny Cash, and the Vineyard Group (21). Balmer focused primarily on the Contemporary Christian Music (CCM) scene, which didn’t evolve until the 1990s. He interviewed the group, Jars of Clay, that was instrumental (pun intended) in the second evangelical music boom (22).

So, if you encounter an individual that is modestly dressed, witnesses to you about the fire he has for the lord from being saved (while listening to contemporary Christian music), and hands you a bible and tells you that it is protected by God and free of any error, you might have found yourself an evangelical.


(1) (Balmer 2006)
(2) (Bowker 2000)
(3) In a discussion about folk religion as compared to the Native Americans, Goustad writes, “Similarity of structure, however, does not imply uniformity in expression.” (Goustad and Noll 2003, 2) I found that there was a parallel between the variety of early native traditions and Evangelicalism as described in Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory.
(4) (Balmer 2006, 335)
(5) (Balmer 2006, 336)
(6) There are several references throughout the book (Balmer 2006) about the “true Christian”: speaking in tongues (or other spiritual gifts), xv; witnessing, 4; attending a particular kind of church (one that teaches inerrancy of the Bible and End Times prophecies), 60; followers of a particular preacher (in some cases), 78; can’t mix the Bible and “heathen” traditions, 220; and repentance and obedience, 241 to cite a few.
(7) Roman Catholics are not considered “real” Christians by many Evangelicals. (Balmer 2006, 4)
(8) (Balmer 2006, xvi)
(9) (Balmer 2006, 64)
(10) (Balmer 2006, 97, 108, 228-230, 231, and 237))
(11) (Balmer 2006, 41-44 and 161)
(12) (Balmer 2006, 44, 148-173, 190, 205, and 236)
(13) (Balmer 2006, 44)
(14) (Balmer 2006, 21 and 98)
(15) (Balmer 2006, 44, 81, and 205)
(16) (Balmer 2006, 134 and 323)
(17) (Balmer 2006, 82, 148, 173, and 299) and (Stowe 2013)
(18) I must admit that I am pro-choice and this is an issue I have been debating the sixth grade, As such, I have heard many accounts, over time, about what used to happen to desperate women who sought to end an unwanted pregnancy before it was legal.

(19) (Balmer 2006, 320)
(20) (Balmer 2006, 297-298)
(21) (Stowe 2013)
(22) (Balmer 2006, 293-308)

Bibliography
Balmer, Randall. Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory. 4th. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2006.

Bowker, John. "Folk Religion." The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. Oxford University Press. 2000. 

http://www.oxfordreference.com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/view/10.1093/acref/9780192800947.001.0001/acref-9780192800947-e-2493 (accessed December 8, 2013).

Goustad, Edwin Scott, and Mark A. Noll. A Documentary History of Religion in America: To 1877. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2003.

Stowe, David. "No Sympathy for the Devil Lecture." East Lansing, December 2, 2013.

Saturday, November 17, 2012

The Golden Rule & Islam

If you asked the average, non-Muslim American if human rights were a consideration in shari’a law, they’d likely tell you “no”. If you asked Abdullahi Ahmed Al-Na’im, he might agree, but that would depend on if you meant God’s actual shari’a, or shari’a as it exists in the Middle East today. Some of the main problems he cites are the failure of the UN to define the terms “human rights” and “fundamental freedoms” in Article 1.3 and the differing frames of reference across cultural and religious boundaries. His solution is to take a new enlightened look at religion and the major traditions in order to find their common normative principal – essentially, the “Golden Rule” – to treat others as you would yourself want to be treated.

UN Golden Rule Poster
Why hasn't this concept brought peace? It is because people tend to apply the concept to members of their own groups, excluding the “others”. Islam has been no exception, although some believe it wasn't intended to be that way. The main issue is that too much emphasis is given to the Medinan verse without consideration given to the historical context. The Meccan verses are much more agreeable to human rights and freedoms and abrogate the earlier verses where Islam was under threat of being wiped out. It’s easy to take verses out of context scripturally and historically to twist words for any reason, but when you look from the perspective of context, a much different story emerges.

Self-determination is one of the rights and fundamental freedoms that every human should be able to enjoy. Part of self-determination is the ability to believe and follow the religion the heart, mind, and soul chooses. Some think that shari’a doesn't allow for religious freedom. They cannot be more wrong.

It is true that there is a tradition that calls for death for apostasy; however, Mohamed Talbi argues that this involves a misreading of the Qur’an. He cites 2:256 as proof that compulsion “is clearly incompatible religion” and 10:99 as proof that God willed that there be diversity and freedom in religious beliefs.

The Golden Rule requires that everyone treat each other as if they were our twin, which means that as humans, we are equal and deserving of the same rights and freedoms as each other. Respecting religious freedom is not mere tolerance; it’s a basic human right.

This is a response paper that was originally written in reference to Chapters 18, 19, and 24 of Liberal Islam: A Source Book for REL 432: Modern Muslim Thought at Michigan State University in September 2012

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Shura and Democracy are One

This is a response paper that was originally written in reference to Chapters 1-4 and 9-10 of Liberal Islam: A Source Book for REL 432: Modern Muslim Thought at Michigan State University in September 2012.

Ali Abd al-Raziq contended that the Prophet’s duty was to spread a message, not to form a state. He believed that the leadership of the message was so different from that of kings that they could be opposites. He also points out that the Prophet’s leadership was wider than that of a king. He offers many verses from the Qur’an where the Prophet’s mission was contrasted with that as a warden, guardian, or king. He was a reminder, not an oppressor or dominator, “sent to warn alone” (11:12). Thus, he believed that Islam was religious, not political, thus democracy as a possibility.

Muhammad Khalaf-Allah furthered the idea of Islamic democracy, believing it was not only compatible, but required his argument to support this belief rests on surah 3:159, “And seek their counsel in all affairs. And when you have come to a decision, place your trust in God alone.” It is this verse that he believes makes shura obligatory. He compares what the Europeans say about representation, majority ruling, and removal of a corrupt ruler is the same as follows in Islamic law.

Ayatolla Mahmud Taleqani speaks about the freedoms and mercies that should be the basis of Islamic order and the atrocities that have been foolishly committed in the name of God. This line of thinking is in line, again with the idea of democracy and perhaps suggests the idea of the separation of “church” and state.

Muhammed Sa’id al-Ashmawi explains how the politicization of shari’a and casting ancient jurisprudence as if of equal importance to the Qur’an and sunnah and covering it in concrete (made definitive and stagnant) corrupted the original intentions in the Prophet’s message, thus corrupted our idea of shari’a. He maintains the importance of itjihad and the importance given to the changes of time and customs.

Rachid Ghannouchi promoted the idea that it is better to have a secular democracy than no democracy at all, although an Islamic democracy is preferred. He explains that it is in Muslims’ best interest to be involved in secular democracy when an Islamic one is not possible to make sure the government is just and protects civil liberties.

Sadek Jawad Sulaiman explained how shura is no different, in fact, one in the same as democracy and that the more democratic, and more civil rights are protected, the more Islamic the system.

Originally written for REL 432: Modern Muslim Thought at Michigan State University - Sept. 2012



Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Your Politeness is Insulting Me

Most of us are taught manners starting at an early age. "Please", "Thank You", "I'm Sorry", etc. are the tools we are told to use to make it in community. First, we are taught that it is about respect. We are taught at the dinner table to use these words in the nicest way to ask for what we want and to show our appreciation for then being given what we asked for. It starts with respecting our elders, and in time, with respecting our family (mostly the siblings we quibble with and feel the least desire to be polite with). Later we find that these manners are taught to us to help us maneuver in the world at large. WHY?

A few things come to mind as I think about this. Recently, at a Campus Interfaith Council meeting that I was at, we talked about Peace and War. A couple of individuals thought that peace comes first from within before it can be extended to the outer world. As part of this, they felt that building character is very important to the process of finding peace within. I chimed in that I was pleased that my children's schools take an active role in helping kids build character by teaching them manners... by teaching them, through a national program called "Character Counts", the "proper" way to behave... just as we are supposed to be taught by our parents at the dinner table. But I think the way that the schools approach it must be different than the way most parents do. Maybe that is because schools have a larger "experience" and education behind them than most parents. Parents typically teach what they were taught. Schools have a vast array of individuals and fields of study to collaborate on their approach. But, I digress...

The next thing that comes to mind is a conversation I had recently with my boyfriend. We had been arguing and had decided to break up. I was exhausted emotionally, and was very hungry because it was late and I had not eaten yet, so I told him I wanted to get off of the phone to go find something to eat. And what did this man do? He invited me to go to his place for dinner. WHAT?! First he told me that he didn't want to be with me anymore, and then he invites me to dinner? Who does that? He does, apparently. WHY? To be polite. When I questioned him about it and told him he was crazy and confusing me, he got upset, saying that I "should have just said, 'no, thank you'" instead of getting upset. He thought I was bad mannered because I was honest in my reaction to his invitation - and I thought he was bad mannered for inviting me, when I knew he didn't actually mean it, when he was just being polite. (Unless it was a ploy... which, considering we are back together already, probably was...)

Finally, I went to dinner with a friend recently, and my friend took the bill. I thanked him for dinner, and he was insulted that I said "Thank you". He said, "There is no need for 'thank you' between friends". I admit, that friends are supposed to help each other and will often "fight" over a bill to try to be the nice one to buy. It's a game of politeness and true friendship. However, I admit, if a friend tried to pay me for watching their children or something else of that nature - a favor - I would indeed be insulted. Friends grant friends favors, at least in my world. BUT, I was raised to say "thank you" to show genuine appreciation. I do not say it to be polite. If I say it, I mean it. I am not always polite, but I do feel I have pretty good manners. I try not to lie to make someone feel better, or to mitigate power controls and fears (look up "Politeness Theory"). I say the truth as I see it, and generally I try to do it with tact. Tact. Sigh. Maybe it's all semantics. Regardless, I'd rather someone be honest with me than be "polite".


What do you think?

Saturday, October 13, 2012

Pluralism and Salvation



In today’s global society, the need for interreligious dialogue is becoming very important amongst efforts for creating peace. It is for this reason that I returned to school to pursue a BA in Religious Studies and a career in interfaith relations. I intend to work closely with Muslim – Christian relations, and as such, knowing the contemporary arguments for religious ecumenism is as important as knowing the history for and against pluralism and salvation of the “other” in Islam.

In Mohammad Hassan Khalil’s “Salvationand the ‘Other’ in Islamic Thought: The Contemporary Pluralism Debate (inEnglish)”, the fact that not all pluralists are created equal is made known. Pluralism in Islam (and likely elsewhere) has divisions which is a main reason for the diversity in arguments for pluralistic salvation. Categorizing the arguments starts by categorizing the types of pluralists. It is of some importance to note that most of these pluralists write in English and reside in predominantly non-Muslim countries.

The esoteric perennialist school of thought began with Rene Guenon. Its core belief is that each of the major religions has truth and lead to God. Later, John Hick argued a congruous form of pluralism akin to the story of the elephant and the blind men – the seeming differences in religion are actually only because of perspective and frame of reference. Building on the perennialist thought and distancing from Hick’s view, Reza Shah-Kazemi uses the term universalism and suggests that in order for a religion to be a valid path to salvation, it need to be divinely inspired, not a human construct.

A critical issue with all of these arguments is that they frequently refer to the Qur’an almost exclusively, whereas the majority of Muslims view hadith to be authoritive. In order for many of these Muslims to be open to the pluralist arguments, there may need to be some reconciliation with their views based on hadith. Simply writing hadith off as fabricated or corrupt does a disservice to the debate, as it is akin to telling someone that what they believe in is lies.

The best way to move forward in the debate, which is one important to interfaith relations locally and globally, is to determine how best to help create a paradigmatic revolution. These paradigm shifts are possible, as history has shown us – in both the USA with the civil rights movement and in recent times, in the Middle East with the Arab Spring.

Saturday, September 15, 2012

My Jihad

Although I had to take a break Thursday after becoming literally ill from reading many hateful comments (from all sides) regarding a recent religious hate crime, and the fact that the walls may have thickened in some, I am not giving up. I believe in the Interfaith Movement and I believe that I have a role to play in it, no matter how small. These brick walls were meant to be torn down, even if my head bleeds while banging my head on them.

I will not give in because there are ignorant people out that that will use any excuse to stir up trouble. This is my path, and I tread it with passion. I know how I am and how emotional I can get and how passionate those emotions can be, so strong as to take me off my feet at times. I won't let it take me out. I may have to rest my eyes from the carnage from time to time and breath in fresh air to re-liven my spirit, but with God's help, I will keep on.  I will fight for the rights of anyone to believe that which is their own, with only one exception - don't abuse those beliefs to hurt others. That is not what has been taught by the wise men and women of the ages. Love is. And love it will be.

I will support my friends of all faiths and non-faiths. I will hold their hands and help raise them up when their spirits are down. I will do my God given work to tear down the walls between people with differences and help them toward mutual respect. It starts with me and hopefully continues with you.

Ameen.

(Note: I was taking a break from the debates and dialogues and news that were erupting everywhere, in the Facebook groups I belong to, and on my own Facebook wall. Feel free to come take a look, I take subscribers to my public posts)

Saturday, August 25, 2012

Interfaith Marrige Part 3, OOPS! I mean Interfaith Dating part 1.5

Upon reading a post written by a progressive Muslim man regarding dating, I replied with the following:


I hope I can answer your question about how you can be in a relationship with someone of differing beliefs without forcing your own on her. It's easy and it's difficult. The first step is very very important. Do you believe the same where it matters most to you? If yes, continue to step two, if no - move on, you will not be right together.

There are fundamental things that a couple must know about each other to determine if they can make it in the long haul: 1. religion, 2. kids and parenting style, 3. household expectations (i.e. roles), and 4. anything else that YOU personally might consider a "deal breaker". Don't compromise on these things, it will only cause resentment in the long run. Also, truly know yourself and be able to be
honest with yourself. This may sound trite to some, but I personally believe that most men and women these days do not really know themselves until close to thirty.

Step two: if you don't want religion to be an issue, it won't be, but make SURE that she is on the same page with that. My boyfriend of over a year now is Chaldean. We were each warned by a common friend that (she's a Muslim) and (he's a Christian) because of our religious differences. But, I am a progressive Muslim with a Christian family and Christian children. I'm also an interfaith advocate. He's simply not that religious. Religion is not an issue for us because we don't make it one. His exact words to me one day (after asking if he wanted to go to church with us - the kids wanted to go), "don't take me to no church and don't take me to no mosque". We do our religious things separately and we respect each others faiths.

Personally, for me, I find it is easier for me to find Christians and agnostics that accept me far more than Muslim men. Most of the Muslim men I know are very traditional. I have even been warned away from one who I thought had a true interest in me, as I was told, "he will use you for now and then his family will have him marry someone from his own community - NOT an American.

If my man and I don't make it, it will not be because of religion (I will admit rocky waters), rather it will be personal differences of which I ignored some red flags early on. If we don't make it, I really would like to be with a Muslim man, and I do want to get married again, but I fear the constant rejection from "not being Muslim enough" (yes, I have been told that) or a man that wants to reign me in.

BTW, a lesson I learned from my failed marriage and my parents successful yet turbulent marriage: commitment and hard work are extremely important. 


Also, in agreement with another poster, I said: It is better to be with someone like minded when you run the gamut with little kids. 

Marriage is a series of hills and valleys. You will not always feel in love, but you have to find ways to bring it back. Trust and COMMUNICATION are key - so is an imagination.

One last thought: "courting" sounds like what you should be doing. Ah, what I would do for a man that properly courted me (before and during our marriage). sigh.... wistful sigh....

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Choosing Islam: Women in the West

Introduction
In the wake of 9/11, Islam has been under much scrutiny in the west, especially in America. The media, the government, and the general public are now more aware of this “eastern” or, rather, “middle eastern” religion than there were prior to the Twin Towers and the Pentagon attacks. Many people in the west have come to fear this religion, especially fundamentalist Christians, because of the terrorist acts of Al-Qaeda. Despite this general fear and distrust of Islam in the west, many western women have been accepting Islam as their new religion. What seems most shocking about this phenomenon is the idea that many people have about how Islam treats women; they believe that Islam is oppressive to women. So the obvious question asked is: Why are western women choosing Islam?

Historically, Islam has actually been present in America since at least the days of slavery. It is estimated that ten to twenty-five percent of the Africans that were enslaved and brought to American in seventeenth to nineteenth centuries were Muslim. There is actually a well-known book (and TV series) that shows how Islam did exist in America via African slaves: “Roots”. Although Islam may have been present in American via slavery, the practice of Islam by the slaves was washed away by the demands of their “masters”, who required them to follow their own religion, typically Christianity. The Islamic names were also washed away by the taking on of the masters’ names.  (Simmons) This loss of practice and knowledge is one reason why Islam seems so new in America to many of her public.

Click to see a short video about Roots and Islam
African Americans play a big part in the surge of women accepting Islam in America. Part of this phenomenon is in reaction or response to the slave days. In some ways, African Americans that descended from slaves felt that they could take back their ancestors’ identities by embracing Islam. Islam also gave them a voice. Islam gave them a way to belong and a way to organize against oppression in the USA and fight for their civil liberties. Islam for many African Americans may have been more of a political choice than religious at first, but ultimately became religious. (Simmons)

Islam did not enter America only once with slavery. Carol Anway, in her book titled, Daughters of another Path, mentions a booklet called A Century of Islam in America, by Yvonne Haddad, in which three waves of Muslim immigration is mentioned: the first in 1875, a second in the 1930s that is stopped by World War II, and a third in the 1950s and 60s. These waves were part of the growth of Islam in America, a growth that brought this “other” religion to cities and Universities across America, where it started to become more likely that Americans would get to know Islam from friends, fellow students, neighbors, and co-workers. (Anway) As women in the west began learning about Islam, some began to accept Islam as their own religion, converting sometimes from Christianity, other religions, or from an atheistic or secular position. There has not been a lot of research into why women in the west are accepting Islam more and more, but some factors have been identified.

Marriage
One of the reasons women convert to Islam is through marriage to a Muslim man. One might think that she is obligated to covert for the sake of the marriage, as is often the case in Catholicism and Judaism, but this is not the case. Muslim men are allowed to marry a woman who is Muslim, Christian, or Jewish. As long as she is one of “the people of the book”, the marriage is halal, or lawful. It is only men that are obligated to convert for the sake of marriage, as a Muslim woman is to marry only a Muslim man.

Even though women are not obligated to convert for the sake of the marriage, they often do. There are a few reasons this occurs. Sometimes a woman will fall in love with a Muslim man and will convert to his religion to become more attractive to him as a potential wife. If she converts after marriage, it might be in an effort to be more accepted by her husband and his family, or by the community to which he belongs. (Allievi) As much as they might be expected to be, these are not always the reasons a woman who marries a Muslim man will convert to Islam herself.

Often times, it is the introduction to Islam via her love interest, or husband that brings her to the acceptance of Islam. It is not always for social reasons, but also, and many times, is because she finds something fulfilling about Islam itself. Perhaps she had never really known about Islam before she met her love interest and in the process of getting to know him, she gets to know Islam, and then ultimately accepts it for herself. (Anway)
 
Acquaintance
Similar to learning about Islam through a significant other, or husband, many women first learn about Islam through a friend, co-worker, fellow student, or colleague. She may find their new Muslim friend to be unusual and will be inquisitive about their religion, maybe even attempt to convert them to her own religion. The best way to prepare for a debate is to know your opponent, and so evangelical Christians looking to convert their new Muslim friend to Christianity start studying the Qur’an in an attempt to become familiar with this other religion and to build arguments against it. What they find occurs during their studies, though, is that they are drawn to Islam and find themselves understanding and even agreeing with what they find in the Qur’an. They find themselves wanting to learn more about Islam and then accept Islam instead of converting their friend. (Nieuwkerk)

Aminah Assilmi converted to
Islam while trying to evangelize
the Muslims in her college drama class.
Even if evangelism is not a motive in learning about Islam, many people who have made a Muslim acquaintance find themselves wanting to learn more. Sometimes it is a pious nature of their Muslim friend that intrigues the non-Muslims. Most times they are surprised by the natures of their new friend – they are nothing like the terrorists of 9/11! When they realize their own ignorance of the religion, they want to learn more in an attempt to understand their friend, co-worker, or colleague better. Again, it is during this exploration that they find something within what they learn that draws them in to an acceptance of Islam. (Haddad)

Quest for Answers
Sometimes, as in the way of acquaintance, converts originally stumbled upon Islam; sometimes it is a quest of knowledge or a quest for answers to what doesn’t make sense that leads converts to Islam. Perhaps it is dissatisfaction for the explanations of certain aspects of the religion they were raised with that leads them on such a quest. These people are naturally inquisitive and don’t rest with an answer that doesn’t make sense to them. They may seek answers in many different religions before settling on Islam. The common report with these converts is that they found that what they read in the Qur’an not only made sense to them logically, but also answered those questions that had long plagued them and that no one else, not even their clergy could answer. (Haddad)

Often the intellectual pursuits come from Christianity. When the trinity or the idea of Jesus as the son of God or as God incarnate don’t make sense, or when bible contradictions are frustrating and the lack of adequate answers even more so, converts find solace in the logic and clearness of the Qur’an. Questions that they felt they would never have answers to, suddenly make sense. Science agrees with religion. Religion agrees with logic. (Anway)
Camilla Leyland, 32, pictured in Western and Muslim dress,
converted to Islam in her mid-20s for 'intellectual and feminist reasons'
Anti-Feminism
Some women in the west are frustrated with the expectations thrust upon them and they see Islam as a way to be a woman and be comfortable in traditional gender roles without feeling like they have let other women down in the quest for equality among men in society. With feminism, often women are expected not only to be women in a traditional sense, or traditional feminine role, but are also now expected to compete with men. In some ways, women are expected to be both men and women, whereas men are only expected to be men. This can be very exhausting and frustrating for women that are perfectly happy to be a mom and a wife or who are tired of expecting to be super-woman all of the time. There is a common idea, a misconception that Islam is anti-feminist. Islam calls for equity between men and women, but does recognize gender differences. It is the fact that Islam allows for these gender differences that sometimes is a draw for women.

Women are cherished in Islam. There is a misconception in the west that Muslim women are oppressed, often because of the Islamic coverings – abaya, hijab, and/or niqab – that many Muslim women wear. Women are revered for being mothers. Women are protected, cared for, and provided for by men in Islam. This can be a very strong draw for women that are tired of being subjected to the common abuses they face in western society. In Islam it is OK to be a stay at home mother who focuses on raising her children properly. She is not looked down upon for not competing with man in the workforce, rather she is protected and provided for because of the important job she has in raising the children to be successful adults. 

Feminism
Although it seems contradictory to the idea many people have - that Islam is anti-feminist, Islam frequently gives women a voice in what is often a man’s world. The Qur’an is specific about the equity between men and women, and was written long before women’s suffrage in America. Women often refer to the fact that being Muslim and wearing hijab and/or abaya makes them more equal with men. The coverings force others to look at them for their minds and abilities rather than their looks. They feel safer and free-er from objectification.

Shaikha Shakina Reinhertz
A particular “brand” of Islam, Sufism, is especially appealing to many feminist types. Sufism gives not only importance to women, but even allows women to be religious leaders. Sufism is mystical, more spiritual and less confined by the “rules” of Sunni or Shi’a Islam. Feminists often like the freedom of expression and teachings that Sufism offers them. (Jawad)

Problem Solving
Some who have studied conversion in the west have suggested that perhaps the conversion to Islam is sometimes a subconscious reaction to societal or personal problems the convert perceives. (Wohlrab-Sahr) Islam gives these converts a way to correct the problems they either have experienced or perceive as problems in society. (Jawad) And converts often embrace Islam because dissatisfaction with western cultural norms as a motivating factor. (Zebiri) For African Americans, Islam is a way to reclaim their identity and to raise political clout. (Simmons) For women who are tired of feminism, it is a way to find peace in the fact that they are OK with traditional gender roles. For women that are tired of the way women are sexualized and objectified in the west, Islam gives them a way to correct what they see as immorality and/or a way to no longer be subjected to objectification and over-sexualization. (Nieuwkerk) For women that have had a hard time feeling like they fit in anywhere, conversion gives them a new start to belong to something and with others.

In many ways, the problem solving that Islam provides is in the form of a new identity for the convert. This can come in the form of a new outer appearance, such as donning the hijab (typically referring to the head covering), or even niqab (face veil). Sometimes the new identity is as extreme as a legal name change to that of a more Islamic name. (Allievi) Even being part of a new community, or Ummah, can be a part of the new identity building process. In some ways, the new identity is a way for the convert to distance herself from something that she considered to be a problem in her previous “life” as a non-Muslim.

So, who are these women that are accepting Islam? Are they poor, uneducated, battered and abused women that are seeking a new identity in a foreign religion? The answers seem to be surprising to popular media and to some researchers. While compiling research for her book, Daughters of Another path, Carol Anway found that over 50% of her respondents held a Bachelor’s degree or higher. During her fieldwork for Women Embracing Islam, Karin van Nieuwkerk found that, “most converts appear to be of middle-class background” and that they have their first experience with Islam in the university setting. It is perhaps the natural inquisitive tendencies that ultimately lead many higher educated women (who are more likely from middle to upper level financial demographics to have had the opportunity to have a higher education in the first place) to find a home in Islam. Conversion to Islam is not exactly an easy process in the west, however. 

Costs / Consequences
The stumbling blocks that many converts run into don’t necessarily make the choice to accept Islam a difficult one, but instead provide for some costs, or consequences in their family and social lives. Due to misconceptions, many times the newly converted woman is confronted with opposition from the people she loves most, her family. (Anway) The misconceptions about Islam that many people in the west hold come mostly from a lack of knowledge about the religion, some from bad examples (e.g. Al-Qaeda), and others from a confusion between culture and religion. Sometimes the family hoped that their daughter/sister/niece was just acting out, trying on a new religion like she was trying on clothes, and hope that like when she was a teenager, it was a “phase” that she would grow out of.

Especially in the wake of 9/11, the families and friends may be concerned that their loved one has gotten involved in terrorism, or worry about how their’ daughter’s choice will reflect on them in the community which they belong. They don’t necessarily see her choice to convert as her own, but that of the family at large. If the new convert chooses to don the hijab or other traditionally Islamic clothing, it can be even harder for others to accept. It is one thing if she changes something inwardly, but wholly another when she makes it obvious to all. One tale of how a parent reacted is given in Carol Anway’s Daughters of Another Path: “They were very upset at first but now they reluctantly accept it. My father got very angry and twisted my arm and told me about my hijab, to ‘take that thing off because I don’t want to be seen with you in public.’”

Sometimes the parents of a convert see her choice as a personal insult, especially if they are particularly religious in the previous faith. They see their daughter’s choice as a slap in the face or an overt rejection. (Jawad) Over time, if the family ties are strong and the convert and the family and friends give each other a chance to see how things will be, they learn that this is a decision that she made – for herself and not “to” anyone. Most times, but not always, a new understanding is found and the relationships continue on in a positive direction.

Relationships with family and friends or within a home community are not the only stumbling blocks that converts come across. They also frequently have to deal with the stigma of being a convert and not a born-Muslim. Sometimes, when they enter the Muslim community, they are not looked upon as serious Muslims by their sisters-in-faith that were born and raised Muslim. Converts can feel scrutinized in the Mosques by the older generation immigrant women and in extreme cases, ostracized. (Haddad) They may struggle to not only be outcast by the society that they came from, but also the one that they were originally so happily joining.

Another way in which converts sometimes struggle with their Ummah, or Muslim community, is that often new converts are akin to born-again Christians. They are very excited about their new found faith and overzealous in not only their adaption of it in their own lives but will critique and correct those around them.  It may be annoying to some born Muslims, who like most people, don’t like to be corrected when they are not following the “rules”. Some of the Ummah, however, may actually be relieved and revived by the spirit of their new sisters. Often new converts have researched Islam more than those that have grown up learning about Islam and can be a source of knowledge about the separation between religion and culture. It can be an avenue of healthy dialogues and the foundation of lasting friendships.

Converts to Islam, especially women converts, play an important role in their Ummah and in their society at large. Converts may or may not be keenly aware of this new role – that of a mediator. The convert is the tie between the west and the “other”. She is one that can help explain the two halves to each other and mediate the conflicts that may or may not erroneously arrive. She may teach her family, friends, and home community about their misconceptions of Islam. She may correct their misunderstandings and foster a new perception about this “foreign” religion. That which is known is far less scary than that which is unknown. She may also be able to help foster a new relationship between the Muslim community and non-Muslims via opportunities for mixing and meeting each other.

Sometimes this new role is realized and not always wanted. It can be scary for the convert to be an example to others. What if she is not a good example? She doesn’t want to give non-Muslims the wrong idea about the faith and she doesn’t want to be scrutinized by her new Muslim community in the same way. She is often times still learning and adapting to her new found faith. Conversion is rarely a phenomenon that lasts only a moment. Converts often convert to Islam slowly and may change their attitudes and adopt different parts or degrees of Islam over time. Sometimes she starts out zealous and then cools down; sometimes she starts out slow and becomes more enraptured over time.

Lastly, a hurdle in the west for the new convert is that of discrimination. In Islam, many women feel that wearing the traditional Islamic coverings like the hijab, abaya, and/or niqab makes them more equal to men as they are judged on their minds and abilities rather than their looks. In the Middle East, this may very well be the case. In America, especially since 9/11 and in the smaller, less urbanized areas, women in traditional dress are more likely to be discriminated against in the workplace than Muslim women that look “like everyone else”. For women that have already been fighting in a man’s world – and maybe have won – to face this new challenge can be extremely difficult. They may be tempted to doff the traditional dress, even if they believe they should wear it, just so they will not be discriminated against. 

Conclusion
Many women in the west have been accepting Islam more and more over the years. The tragedy of 9/11 didn’t seem to slow down this phenomenon, but instead made more people aware of and curious about Islam. The inquisitive individuals who may have had a life filled with questions about their religion or had never found adequate answers or felt a void in their life are attracted to Islam for its logic and simple nature.

Many female converts meet their first Muslim friend at University and sometimes as a significant other. Even if her future husband is her motivation for learning about Islam, it is not by force or coercion that brings her to the faith. Many times, she is the one that brings him back to practicing the faith regularly and with more conviction.

New converts find peace in their decision on one hand, but a struggle on the other. They have to face telling their family and friends about their choice and risk rejection or opposition. They struggle with acceptance within their new Ummah and proving themselves to born-Muslims. They find themselves as an instant mediator between Islam and the west – often working hard to correct misconceptions and spread awareness about True Islam versus the faith of the extremist groups.

These women are not oppressed and come from some of the free-est societies in the world. Sometimes their choice to accept Islam is in a backlash against feminism that has made things more difficult on women – they see how women and mothers are venerated in Islam and they wish for equity but to also be able to live out the gender roles that feel more natural to them. For them, Islam is not only a logical faith that has answered their questions, but allows them to live the identity that they feel most comfortable with.

Bibliography

Allievi, Stefano. "The Shifting Significance fo the Halal/Haram Frontier." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the West. Ed. Karin van Nieukerk. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 120-149.
Anway, Carol L. Daughters of Another Path. Yawna Publications, 1995.
Haddad, Yvonne Yazbeck. "The Quest for Peace in Submission." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the WEst. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 19-47.
Jawad, Haifaa. "Female Conversion to Islam." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the West. Ed. Karin van Nieuwkerk. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 153-171.
Nieuwkerk, Karin van. "Gender, Conversion, and Islam." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the West. Ed. Karin van Nieuwkerk. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 95-119.
Simmons, Gwendolyn Zoharah. "African American Islam as an Expression of Converts' Religious Faith and Nationalist Dreams and Ambitions." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the West. Ed. Karin van Niewkerk. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 172 - 191.
Wohlrab-Sahr, Monkika. "Symbolizing Distance." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the West. Ed. Karin van Nieuwkerk. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 71-92.
Zebiri, Kate. British Muslim Converts: Choosing Alternative Lives. Oxford: OneWorld Press, 2008.

Originally written for my Islam class in the spring of 2011