Labels

Abortion Allah America ancient anti-feminism Apostle Arab Arabia Aristotle Augustine autobiography bank banking beliefs Bhudda Bible biblical bigot bigotry biography Buddha Day Buddhism canon catholic Catholicism character charisma children christian christianity Christmas church Cinema civilization clutter commentary compromise conflict controversy conversion convert courtship creed crisis Crito culture custody dating debate deed democracy dhamma dharma dialogue differences diversity divorce dukkha Eastern Orthodoxy economics elections elephant esoteric essay ethics ethnicity Evangelical Evangelism extremism extremist fable faith family fatwa feminism fiction Folk four noble truths friends fringe Fun Gandha Baba gender generosity Giri Bala; Babaji global studies gnostic God golden rule good goodness Gorgias Gospel greed hadith hate Hebrew Bible heretic Hinduism hoarding Holiday home I AM ibn Baz idiom idols individuality initiative insurance interest interfaith interpretation interracial Iranaeus Iraq islam Israel Israeli jannah Jesus Jesus freak Jesus movement Jew jihad Judaism jurisprudence kids Kindness knowledge Kriya Yoga language law liberal liberals life Life of Pi love manners Mark marriage meaning Mecca meditation mess Middle East miracle Mission moderation Mohammed monastery money monk movie Muratorian muslim myth mythology Native American New Years opinion opportunity Padre Pio pagan Palestine pastor path Paul Paula Fredriksen pay it forward peace perception perennialist personality philosophy Pink Floyd Plato polite politeness politics pro-choice pro-life progressive proof Protestant proto-orthodox proverbs psychology Qaradawi Qur'an reincarnation relationship religion repentance respect responsibility retrospection revert review Rick Santorum rights rules Saint sala salvation science scripture secrets semantics sermon shari'a sharia shrine shura sin Socrates Soroush spirituality St. Theresa of Avila Strangers stuff Subculture Symposium tact Tanakh Tariq Ramadan temple terrorism terrorist Thanksgiving theology Theravada Therese Neumann tradition translation turkey understanding universalism USA values Vesak Visakha Puja wisdom women Xenophon Yogananda Yogi zealot
Showing posts with label faith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label faith. Show all posts

Friday, November 23, 2012

The Science of Religion

In The Evolution and Devolution of Religious Knowledge by Abdul-Karim Soroush, an idea that I can identify with is given about what people call religious knowledge. First, is that it is not knowledge, per se. I agree with Soroush that divine scripture is indeed divine, but the meaning we humans derive from the words given to us is completely human, which means that it too (like humans) can be full of error.

Because I have a Bachelors of Science in Biology, I am quite familiar with scientific inquiry, methodology, and theories. I am aware that in science, nothing can be proved; only disproved. Everything else is a theory until it is generally accepted and holds up against criticism and experiments to disprove. If a theory holds up, it is considered a law (as in a law of nature), but even laws can be disproved. It is no different with the study of religion. Proof may exist, but we will have to die to find it (perhaps repeatedly if reincarnation is true).

Soroush also explains how every interpretation of religion begins with preconceived notions and assumptions. From personal experiences to the societal whole, our perceptions are biased. As he explains, just asking the question biases the answer. Again, it is the same for science and, I would add, statistics. Asking the question is great, but often not all the variables are considered. So what gets missed? Perhaps we will never know. Perhaps someone else will consider those variables and come up with their own interpretation.

When I consider what I have learned in my religious studies, about the vast array of ideas and beliefs, I can’t help but see Soroush’s points about religious “knowledge”. That to me does not create a problem with faith, as his critics may see it. I think that acknowledging our human shortcomings can only help move us forward, because how else can we grow without knowing where we fail? You can’t fix what you don’t believe is broken. If anyone thinks we humans are perfect, then why would we need God? Perfection is the goal, but we haven’t met it yet. If we had, our world would be a much better place: a garden with lush rivers flowing underneath.

This is a response paper that was originally written in reference to The Evolution and Devolution of Religious Knowledge by Abdul-Karim Soroush for REL 432: Modern Muslim Thought at Michigan State University in September 2012 

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Reincarnation & Islam

It’s amazing how much one word can drive debate. Reincarnation seems to be one of those concepts that either a person believes or they don’t. There is no middle ground. So, the fact that it has been a debate in Islam is of no surprise to me. I've been debating the possibility of reincarnation since I was young. In fact, it was this very word, heard out of my mouth, which caused the first religious debate in my life – with my conservative Christian grandmother. I will never forget that day nor the first question she asked and my first reply.

I find it extremely interesting that this debate takes place in Islam as well, because up until I read this article, I had no idea it did, although I still held my belief in the possibility. However, because I do love to debate, I also like to play “devil’s advocate”. In doing so, I would point out that “dead” and “die” in the verse, "And you were dead, and He brought you back to life. And He shall cause you to die, and shall bring you back to life, and in the end shall gather you unto Himself" (2:28) could be figurative as well as literal. Death could be death to ignorance and rebirth into truth. In Christian theology, baptism is a type of death and rebirth, where the death is to the sinner and rebirth to the saved. The same could be said of Islam.

As for the critics against the concept of reincarnation, I can see how they also are reading the verses of the Qur’an. This, like so many debates in Islam and in religion in general, is a matter of interpretation. Beginning and leading out from there, you have perception. Until each and every human has exactly the same experiences in life, perception will remain, which means so will differing interpretations.

This is a response paper that was originally written in reference to Reincarnation in Islam by Sultan Shahin, Asia Times Online, Dec 25, 2003, for REL 432: Modern Muslim Thought at Michigan State University in September 2012 

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Pluralism and Salvation

In today’s global society, the need for inter-religious dialogue is becoming very important in the efforts for creating peace. It is for this reason that I returned to school to pursue a BA in Religious Studies and a career in interfaith relations. I intend to work closely with Muslim – Christian relations, and as such, knowing the contemporary arguments for religious ecumenism is as important as knowing the history for and against pluralism and salvation of the “other” in Islam.

In Mohammad Hassan Khalil’s “Salvation and the ‘Other’ in Islamic Thought: The Contemporary Pluralism Debate (in English)”, the fact that not all pluralists are created equal is made known. Pluralism in Islam (and likely elsewhere) has divisions - a main reason for the diversity in arguments for pluralistic salvation. Categorizing the arguments starts by categorizing the types of pluralists. It is of some importance to note that most of these pluralists write in English and reside in predominantly non-Muslim countries.

The esoteric perennialist school of thought began with Rene Guenon. Its core belief is that each of the major religions has truth and lead to God. Later, John Hick argued a congruous form of pluralism akin to the story of the elephant and the blind men – the seeming differences in religion are actually only because of perspective and frame of reference. Building on the perennialist thought and distancing from Hick’s view, Reza Shah-Kazemi uses the term universalism and suggests that in order for a religion to be a valid path to salvation, it need to be divinely inspired, not a human construct.

A critical issue with all of these arguments is that they frequently refer to the Qur’an almost exclusively, whereas the majority of Muslims view hadith to be authoritative. In order for many of these Muslims to be open to the pluralist arguments, there may need to be some reconciliation with their views based on hadith. Simply writing hadith off as fabricated or corrupt does a disservice to the debate, as it is akin to telling someone that what they believe in is lies.

The best way to move forward in the debate is to determine how best to help create a paradigmatic revolution. These paradigm shifts are possible, as history has shown us – in both the USA with the civil rights movement and in recent times, in the Middle East with the Arab Spring.

This is a response paper that was originally written in reference to Salvation and the ‘Other’ in Islamic Thought: The Contemporary Pluralism Debate (in English) by Mohammad Hassan Khalil for REL 432: Modern Muslim Thought at Michigan State University in September 2012

Monday, November 19, 2012

Paradise for the Perfect

While reading Sayyid Qutb's Qur'anic Commentary on sura 98, I found myself frequently commenting off to the side, “oh, really”. He makes several statements throughout his analysis about which he gives no support. As I stated in my last response paper, entitled “Sharing Jannah, one of the first steps in analysis of the Qur’an is to pick your translation. Qut’b clearly picked one for surah 98. He then decided to interpret it to mean that only the believers will find Paradise and exist there forever and the rest will burn in the Hell fire.

One problem I have with his analysis is that he makes several statements about Jesus having been the last messenger of Israel and Mohammed as the last prophet period. I found myself asking as I stated above, “oh really?”. Where is his proof? Qut’b offers none. He makes the statement and fails to back it up. Is that because he believes that this is a universally accepted norm? Obviously it is his stance on the subject, but we don’t know why. For me, the rest of his argument based on these assumptions is worthless.

A second problem I had with his analysis is that he offers 109:1-6, “Say: ‘Disbelievers! I do not worship what you worship. Nor do you worship what I worship. I shall never worship what you worship; neither will you worship what I worship. You have your own religion and I have mine’” as part of his proof against the polytheists. However, this same verse can be and has been interpreted to allow for pluralism and religious freedom. Perhaps what he means is that religious freedom and pluralism will exist and is allowed, but they (the others – the non-Muslims) will perish in the Hell-fire for eternity.

Finally, the third problem I have with his analysis is that it only allows for the perfect to find salivation and it does not give any credence to God’s mercy, compassion, and to be the final judge in the decision of Paradise or Hell. Once again, we find a human limiting God’s power.

This is a response paper that was originally written in reference to Commentary for Quran - In the Shade of the Qur'an - by Syed Qutb for REL 432: Modern Muslim Thought at Michigan State University in September 2012

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Sharing Jannah

As a mother would say to her child, “if you want dessert, you have to finish your dinner” or, “if you keep fighting with your sister, you will go to bed early”, scripture, or God’s word tells us how to behave to receive reward or how not to behave to avoid punishment. Every family and every religion has rules. But what do these rules, in Islam, say about the “other”? It seems that it depends on who you ask. Since the scholarly opinions range from inclusion to exclusion, this is question does not seem to have a definite answer.

To demonstrate the pluralistic answer to the question of salvation of Muslims and non-Muslims, Mohammad Hassan Khalil shared opinions of five well-known Muslim scholars: Abu Abū Hāmid al-Ghazālī, Muhyī al-Dīn Ibn al-‘Arabī, Taqiyaddīn Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, and Muhammad Rashīd Ridā. The arguments these scholars make include an analysis of even more questions. Before an answer of who is saved can be determined, one has to decide first how to translate the verses, as many words have multiple meanings, from general to exact. Then, once a translation is made, one has to decide how to interpret them (ijtihad). Interpretation includes even more questions.  Should it matter if the verses are Medinan or Meccan? Does the historical context matter or is it a general statement… or rather, a specific statement for a specific time and place only? Have the verses been abrogated and thus null in meaning to today? So many questions! Oh, but we must back up even further.

What is Islam? Is it possible that non-Mohammed following others, such as the Christians, Jews, and Sabians (people of the book) are in their own way submitting to God in the way that God called them to? Are they “Muslims” of a sort? What about God’s compassion and Mercy? Can’t God decide to save anyone if so desired? So do the rules even matter? The mother might choose to punish the child for his or her naughty behavior, but then will still enfold him or her into her arms, giving forth her love to the child. Will God not be as forgiving, if not more?

As for me, I believe in inclusive love and that only humans limit God’s power and mercy, at a fault.

This is a response paper that was originally written in reference to MUSLIM SCHOLARLY DISCUSSIONS ON SALVATION AND THE FATE OF ‘OTHERS’ by Mohammad Hassan Khalil for REL 432: Modern Muslim Thought at Michigan State University in September 2012

Saturday, November 17, 2012

The Golden Rule & Islam

If you asked the average, non-Muslim American if human rights were a consideration in shari’a law, they’d likely tell you “no”. If you asked Abdullahi Ahmed Al-Na’im, he might agree, but that would depend on if you meant God’s actual shari’a, or shari’a as it exists in the Middle East today. Some of the main problems he cites are the failure of the UN to define the terms “human rights” and “fundamental freedoms” in Article 1.3 and the differing frames of reference across cultural and religious boundaries. His solution is to take a new enlightened look at religion and the major traditions in order to find their common normative principal – essentially, the “Golden Rule” – to treat others as you would yourself want to be treated.

UN Golden Rule Poster
Why hasn't this concept brought peace? It is because people tend to apply the concept to members of their own groups, excluding the “others”. Islam has been no exception, although some believe it wasn't intended to be that way. The main issue is that too much emphasis is given to the Medinan verse without consideration given to the historical context. The Meccan verses are much more agreeable to human rights and freedoms and abrogate the earlier verses where Islam was under threat of being wiped out. It’s easy to take verses out of context scripturally and historically to twist words for any reason, but when you look from the perspective of context, a much different story emerges.

Self-determination is one of the rights and fundamental freedoms that every human should be able to enjoy. Part of self-determination is the ability to believe and follow the religion the heart, mind, and soul chooses. Some think that shari’a doesn't allow for religious freedom. They cannot be more wrong.

It is true that there is a tradition that calls for death for apostasy; however, Mohamed Talbi argues that this involves a misreading of the Qur’an. He cites 2:256 as proof that compulsion “is clearly incompatible religion” and 10:99 as proof that God willed that there be diversity and freedom in religious beliefs.

The Golden Rule requires that everyone treat each other as if they were our twin, which means that as humans, we are equal and deserving of the same rights and freedoms as each other. Respecting religious freedom is not mere tolerance; it’s a basic human right.

This is a response paper that was originally written in reference to Chapters 18, 19, and 24 of Liberal Islam: A Source Book for REL 432: Modern Muslim Thought at Michigan State University in September 2012

Friday, November 16, 2012

Democracy, not Theocracy

Many Muslims believe that both their personal and public lives should be governed by Islam. That is, that they believe that a theocratic system, by which laws are governed by shari’a, is the only government that is allowed or worthy. However, even secular democratic government may not only be allowed, but in line with shari’a.

The Prophet Muhammad’s message was for spiritual purposes and because of whom he was, he was a leader of the people, much as Moses was in his time. He may have seemed like a king, but there was no kingdom established. He left neither a successor nor instructions for future governance.  This not only allowed for the people to create their own form of government, but necessitated it. Thus, the door was left open to the possibility of even a secular and/or democratic government. What was required is that the system be just, as that concept was certainly Islamic.

In addition to justice, other concepts that were of great importance to include in whatever government was to be set up were: social cooperation and mutual assistance; establishing a non-autocratic, consultative method of governance; and institutionalizing mercy and compassion in social interactions. Democracy offers a great opportunity for promoting these ideals, as they naturally are co-aligned. A constitutional democracy further promotes and protects these ideals by setting to law some basic moral standards that hold both the rulers and the citizens equally accountable.

It is necessary for Muslims to be aware that although shari’a (as it literally means) is infallible, as Allah is infallible, humans are not. As such, the human interpretation of the Qur’an is subject to human experience and error. Any law written with Islamic intentions would still not reach the level of shari’a; rather, it would be fiqh, having the potential the potential to be in error. It is for this reason that consensus, or shura is such an important aspect to Islamic law, as what is best for the people is usually best determined by the people.

If we lived in a perfect world and if we were able to understand God’s word perfectly, then we would not need laws. In such an imperfect existence, laws provide some level of protections to human rights – some justice. Laws given in a constitutional democracy might be perhaps, a best-case scenario for upholding Islamic ideals.

This is a response paper that was originally written in reference to pages 3-46 of Islam and the Challenge of Democracy by Khaled Abou El Fadl for REL 432: Modern Muslim Thought at Michigan State University in September 2012.

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Revealing the Progressive Revert

Recently, I was invited to participate as part of a "revert" panel at a Muslim Student Association event at the University I attend. I participated once before, a couple of years ago when I was still a baby in Islam. I was terribly nervous this time around. Over the past couple of years, I have gone through a lot while finding my Muslim identity, including my first true taste of discrimination. It took me a while to find my ummah, and now that I have, I am fairly proud to identify myself as a Progressive Muslim. However, I was a bit terrified that I might be too outspoken about my progressiveness at this event. I didn't want to alienate anyone from me, ruffle any feathers, etc, but I also didn't want to compromise who I am to "tone it down".

Although I only recently found my Muslim identity, I haven't really changed. I used to feel bad for not feeling the need to follow the traditional course, for not conforming, but every time I thought about conforming, it was to "fit in", and that to me was the wrong reason. Now that I know I am not alone out here, I am less apologetic for the way I believe, and maybe a little more outspoken about it, but it's not the popular voice that I speak with, if you know what I mean.

So, mere hours before the event I was sitting nervously, thinking about this dilemma I felt I had and I finally realized that I only had to ask for Allah's help and speak from my heart. Maybe, just maybe, there would be even just one other person in the room that felt lost like I did, and I could let them know that s/he is not alone and that if they needed another progressive shoulder to cry on, they might find it in me.

The first time I participated in this event, I did speak up about being a non-hijabi. When one of the reverts made a comment about "this is how a Muslim woman looks" - in full abaya and hijab (which I support and respect!), I raised my hand, told her I respected her but that I needed to say, pointing to myself, that "this is also what a Muslim woman looks like". So, I figured that this MSA crowd may already have a clue about how I am - the thought that occurred there was that maybe I was getting all worked up over nothing.

There ended up being six of us on the panel and I was not the long-winded one, for once. So, we didn't have much time for other than the "usual" questions. The final question of the night is the one that got me. Someone asked how hard it was to change our behaviors, basically to become good practicing Muslims - 5 prayers a day, wear hijab, eat all halal, etc. He was asking about rules and rituals, not about our hearts.

So, being the only non-hijabi on the panel (out of 4 women), and sitting in a dress that showed my calves, forearms, and my chest and neck (above my cleavage), I knew it was time to face it. I took the microphone and said, "well, rules and rituals mean less to me than intention and meaning, as you can see by looking at me." I went on to explain how frustrating it is to have everyone expect you to be the poster-child for Islam when you convert. How, I am not perfect, nor will I be, no matter how hard I strive to be... that I was human and had the same struggles as the rest of them. I explained how I nearly lost a dear friend of mine because I haven't fulfilled his expectations of me either and how my progressive line of thought disappoints and somewhat offends his traditional reason. I also explained that I do what I do with thought and intention behind it and that I am not one to do something I don't believe in just to fit in. That I have my reasons as to why I do what I do and that I have a relationship with God that is my own and if I have failings, and of course I do, I will face them and be responsible for them. I was unapologetic, but honest.

I am sure I ruffled some feathers, but I did notice a couple of people nodding as I was talking, which gave me strength. One was a male convert I am friends with and one was a female I didn't know yet. After we finished I had several women come up to me and thank me for being honest and wanted to have my contact information to be able to talk to me later about "stuff". My male fellow-convert friend also mentioned me and something I said about not putting us converts up on pedestals (he agreed) on his FB wall. It was interesting to see the conversation that followed. It seems that there are two views on converts, one is that we are somehow better because we chose Islam and have dealt with the struggles of that choice and the other is that we are not better because we have to struggle to be Muslim, whereas born Muslims grew up with the rules and rituals and that they are habits that they have now. And that frustrates me. They still are labeling us as inherently different, whereas I think we are more the same than they wish to admit.

Now I am just curious to find out if I will be invited back a third time...

Saturday, October 13, 2012

Pluralism and Salvation



In today’s global society, the need for interreligious dialogue is becoming very important amongst efforts for creating peace. It is for this reason that I returned to school to pursue a BA in Religious Studies and a career in interfaith relations. I intend to work closely with Muslim – Christian relations, and as such, knowing the contemporary arguments for religious ecumenism is as important as knowing the history for and against pluralism and salvation of the “other” in Islam.

In Mohammad Hassan Khalil’s “Salvationand the ‘Other’ in Islamic Thought: The Contemporary Pluralism Debate (inEnglish)”, the fact that not all pluralists are created equal is made known. Pluralism in Islam (and likely elsewhere) has divisions which is a main reason for the diversity in arguments for pluralistic salvation. Categorizing the arguments starts by categorizing the types of pluralists. It is of some importance to note that most of these pluralists write in English and reside in predominantly non-Muslim countries.

The esoteric perennialist school of thought began with Rene Guenon. Its core belief is that each of the major religions has truth and lead to God. Later, John Hick argued a congruous form of pluralism akin to the story of the elephant and the blind men – the seeming differences in religion are actually only because of perspective and frame of reference. Building on the perennialist thought and distancing from Hick’s view, Reza Shah-Kazemi uses the term universalism and suggests that in order for a religion to be a valid path to salvation, it need to be divinely inspired, not a human construct.

A critical issue with all of these arguments is that they frequently refer to the Qur’an almost exclusively, whereas the majority of Muslims view hadith to be authoritive. In order for many of these Muslims to be open to the pluralist arguments, there may need to be some reconciliation with their views based on hadith. Simply writing hadith off as fabricated or corrupt does a disservice to the debate, as it is akin to telling someone that what they believe in is lies.

The best way to move forward in the debate, which is one important to interfaith relations locally and globally, is to determine how best to help create a paradigmatic revolution. These paradigm shifts are possible, as history has shown us – in both the USA with the civil rights movement and in recent times, in the Middle East with the Arab Spring.

Friday, October 12, 2012

The House that Christ Built



A comparative look at the Gospels of Mark and Thomas
Originally written on 4/19/12 for my Birth of Christianity class
 
Gospel of Thomas
Gospel of Mark
After reading both the gospels of Mark and Thomas with fresh eyes, I am struck with the idea that one is like timber available for building and the other is like a finished structure, ready for tenants.  The gospel of Thomas (hereafter: Thomas) is simply a list of sayings attributed to the person in history named Jesus. It is referred to as his secret teachings, although the secrets are not given away freely, as many of the sayings can be difficult to understand (ex: Thom 10, 17, 19, and especially 42). The gospel of Mark (hereafter: Mark), on the other hand, is a narrative – a story. It has a beginning, middle and, as most stories do, builds to a crescendo before coming to an end. There are no real secrets here, as what Jesus says is often explained to his disciples (Mk 4:14-20). 
When walking through the lumber yard of Thomas, the reader is not given a map, as no map would make sense. There is no seeming order to Jesus’ sayings and sometimes certain sayings even seem to be repeated, although with small variations (ex: Thom 2 and 94; 55 and 101). Although there is no apparent order to the list, one could sort the sayings into themes, the names by which might depend on the reader and his or her interpretations of the sayings.

It is the roughness of Thomas, the crude way it is written as only a list, that I think would have appealed to the first followers of Jesus. It allowed for variations of opinions, for interpretations by the self. Each person would have the same opportunity to find in it those things which resonated within.

Several themes that I noted within the gospel of Thomas may have found resonance with the early Christians. These include the search for knowledge or wisdom, the oneness of all life, the necessity to be like a child to experience the kingdom of God, what God’s imperial rule is like and simple rules to live within humanity’s communities. These themes may have been easily acceptable to any of the followers of Jesus that were familiar with the likes of Socrates, who also was a proponent seeking wisdom and of the concept of “Know thyself” (Thom 2, 3, 67, 92, 94).

Thomas may have also appealed as seeming more authentic, as if the author was writing the sayings down best as he could remember, without tarnishing anything with embellishments. At the same time, it could have put off those that found the list too confusing and difficult to understand, especially with the implication of these being secret teachings; when the reader didn’t understand, it would be too easy for him to disregard it as make-believe. For these people, Mark would be much easier to understand, thus easier to accept as authentic.


Tract Housing
As mentioned before, Mark is much more than a list of sayings, although when walking through the halls of the structure, pieces of Thomas seem to be peeking out through the paint here and there (ex: Mk  2:20, 2:21-22, 6:4-5, 12:17, 12:31,  and Thom 104, 47, 31, 100, 25 respectively). Although the reader can tell that the authors of Mark and Thomas visited the same lumberyard, it is just as evident that Mark’s author either missed much of the materials available, or only sought certain pieces for his structure. Perhaps Mark’s author had an agenda: to tell a story about Jesus from the perspective that he understood. If that was the case, then he would have selected those pieces that made sense to him and then added to them some structure so that other readers would see what he saw. Another possibility could be that Mark’s author knew more details than the author of Thomas. Finally, it is just as likely that the structure was not unique to Mark’s author, but instead was one of several tract homes. 

Mark’s appeal to the Jesus followers would have been the narrative he gave of the man that they followed, worshiped, and glorified. The author begins with Jesus’ baptism in the Holy Spirit and flows through the geographical travels of his subsequent teachings and healings until the author concludes with Jesus’ death and resurrection. Themes found in Mark are the power of belief, the lack of belief in man, the coming of the kingdom of God, a sense of urgency, and the death and resurrection of Jesus. Jesus is also defined in Mark as Christ, son of God, Holy, son of David, last of the prophets, and Lord (Mk 1:1, 1:24, 10:48, 12:6, and 16:19 respectively).  This stands in contrast to Thomas, where Jesus is defined as an angel, philosopher, and teacher, although Jesus rebukes the last saying, “I am not your teacher” (Thom 13).

The definition of Jesus in Thomas is not the only difference we find from Mark. There is no death and resurrection theme in Thomas; rather, the kingdom of God is already present for those that understand (Thom 113). It is not faith that brings salvation in Thomas (Mk 9:2, 22, 29). Instead, looking within and bringing what is inside out is what saves (Thom 70). Also lacking in Thomas are the references to the old testament that point to the idea of Jesus fulfilling ancient prophecy in Mark (Mk 1:2, 10:48, 12:10, 14:49, 15:27). These differences may have separated audiences that paid heed to one gospel or the other (or both).

As mentioned previously, Thomas may have resounded more with Jews that were familiar with philosophers like Socrates. They may have been drawn to some parallel ideas and may even have been interested in the idea of having secret knowledge. I imagine the more philosophical type may have already been less interested in ancient readings such as those found in the Hebrew Bible (except for where wisdom could be gleaned) and would have already been along a path of introspection when Thomas was written. Thus, these people may have been less likely to be looking for the Messiah foretold in the ancient scriptures. Thomas would have also been easier for the gentiles to relate to as well. The Jews that were more scripturally bound may have been more drawn to the finished housing of Mark’s gospel.

Jews that knew their scripture and who were suffering would have taken much solace in learning the tradition of Jesus’ teachings and healings and salvation offered to them through faith in him and in God’s possibilities (Mk 10:27). The gospel as a historical type story would have also been familiar to them, as many of their ancient scriptures that they held dear were written as historical stories. The followers of Mark’s gospel likely saw overlap in Thomas, but may have turned away from it because of the lack of support of Jesus as the Messiah, come to save mankind.

The choice of which gospel one might follow still would have been individual, but I can see the draw to that which is more complete, explained, and feels like guidance. Thomas is given to the reader as a list of secret teachings (or sayings) of the person named Jesus. The sayings are not explained, but left bare, without embellishment. By contrast, Mark is a complete story with explanations given along the way. The house has been built, the walls painted, furniture moved in and waits for the tenant to move in and make it his or her home.

Saturday, September 15, 2012

My Jihad

Although I had to take a break Thursday after becoming literally ill from reading many hateful comments (from all sides) regarding a recent religious hate crime, and the fact that the walls may have thickened in some, I am not giving up. I believe in the Interfaith Movement and I believe that I have a role to play in it, no matter how small. These brick walls were meant to be torn down, even if my head bleeds while banging my head on them.

I will not give in because there are ignorant people out that that will use any excuse to stir up trouble. This is my path, and I tread it with passion. I know how I am and how emotional I can get and how passionate those emotions can be, so strong as to take me off my feet at times. I won't let it take me out. I may have to rest my eyes from the carnage from time to time and breath in fresh air to re-liven my spirit, but with God's help, I will keep on.  I will fight for the rights of anyone to believe that which is their own, with only one exception - don't abuse those beliefs to hurt others. That is not what has been taught by the wise men and women of the ages. Love is. And love it will be.

I will support my friends of all faiths and non-faiths. I will hold their hands and help raise them up when their spirits are down. I will do my God given work to tear down the walls between people with differences and help them toward mutual respect. It starts with me and hopefully continues with you.

Ameen.

(Note: I was taking a break from the debates and dialogues and news that were erupting everywhere, in the Facebook groups I belong to, and on my own Facebook wall. Feel free to come take a look, I take subscribers to my public posts)

Saturday, August 25, 2012

Converted to Islam, Remained Progressive - Not an Oxymoron

My Saudi scarf given to me by a dear friend

I'm progressive, and for those that know me, unapologetically so. However, I often find myself chagrined when I meet other Muslims and they look at me queerly when I tell them I accepted Islam several years ago. She's white. She's a convert (revert). She's NOT wearing hijab??? Why is it that I am expected to tow the traditional line because I used to be Christian? Why am I villianized for being a progressive? And why do I feel guilty that I am not meeting up to their expectations? (although I don't try real hard to... My ultimate concern is with Allah, not what other people think of me)

anecdote: In the spring of 2011, I spoke on a panel of converts for our Islam Awareness Week at the university I attend. I was one of three. To my right was a gentleman that converted through the Nation of Islam. To my left was a woman that converted through marriage. He was dressed without any religious attire (normal American casual dress clothes). She was in abaya and hijab. Sitting in the middle was me, regular clothes, hijab free.

The woman on my left explained to the audience that when she teaches she often get stares and she says to herself, "yes, this is what a Muslim woman looks like". I was slightly offended. When she finished, I stood up and said, "I respect what you said, but THIS is also what a Muslim woman looks like".

Still, I always find myself a bit awkward when meeting other Muslims, especially women. I have been told too many times that I wasn't "Muslim" enough. Thank God I found a community with which to belong: Muslims for Progressive Values. Find them on Facebook.

Elhamdulelah.

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Choosing Islam: Women in the West

Introduction
In the wake of 9/11, Islam has been under much scrutiny in the west, especially in America. The media, the government, and the general public are now more aware of this “eastern” or, rather, “middle eastern” religion than there were prior to the Twin Towers and the Pentagon attacks. Many people in the west have come to fear this religion, especially fundamentalist Christians, because of the terrorist acts of Al-Qaeda. Despite this general fear and distrust of Islam in the west, many western women have been accepting Islam as their new religion. What seems most shocking about this phenomenon is the idea that many people have about how Islam treats women; they believe that Islam is oppressive to women. So the obvious question asked is: Why are western women choosing Islam?

Historically, Islam has actually been present in America since at least the days of slavery. It is estimated that ten to twenty-five percent of the Africans that were enslaved and brought to American in seventeenth to nineteenth centuries were Muslim. There is actually a well-known book (and TV series) that shows how Islam did exist in America via African slaves: “Roots”. Although Islam may have been present in American via slavery, the practice of Islam by the slaves was washed away by the demands of their “masters”, who required them to follow their own religion, typically Christianity. The Islamic names were also washed away by the taking on of the masters’ names.  (Simmons) This loss of practice and knowledge is one reason why Islam seems so new in America to many of her public.

Click to see a short video about Roots and Islam
African Americans play a big part in the surge of women accepting Islam in America. Part of this phenomenon is in reaction or response to the slave days. In some ways, African Americans that descended from slaves felt that they could take back their ancestors’ identities by embracing Islam. Islam also gave them a voice. Islam gave them a way to belong and a way to organize against oppression in the USA and fight for their civil liberties. Islam for many African Americans may have been more of a political choice than religious at first, but ultimately became religious. (Simmons)

Islam did not enter America only once with slavery. Carol Anway, in her book titled, Daughters of another Path, mentions a booklet called A Century of Islam in America, by Yvonne Haddad, in which three waves of Muslim immigration is mentioned: the first in 1875, a second in the 1930s that is stopped by World War II, and a third in the 1950s and 60s. These waves were part of the growth of Islam in America, a growth that brought this “other” religion to cities and Universities across America, where it started to become more likely that Americans would get to know Islam from friends, fellow students, neighbors, and co-workers. (Anway) As women in the west began learning about Islam, some began to accept Islam as their own religion, converting sometimes from Christianity, other religions, or from an atheistic or secular position. There has not been a lot of research into why women in the west are accepting Islam more and more, but some factors have been identified.

Marriage
One of the reasons women convert to Islam is through marriage to a Muslim man. One might think that she is obligated to covert for the sake of the marriage, as is often the case in Catholicism and Judaism, but this is not the case. Muslim men are allowed to marry a woman who is Muslim, Christian, or Jewish. As long as she is one of “the people of the book”, the marriage is halal, or lawful. It is only men that are obligated to convert for the sake of marriage, as a Muslim woman is to marry only a Muslim man.

Even though women are not obligated to convert for the sake of the marriage, they often do. There are a few reasons this occurs. Sometimes a woman will fall in love with a Muslim man and will convert to his religion to become more attractive to him as a potential wife. If she converts after marriage, it might be in an effort to be more accepted by her husband and his family, or by the community to which he belongs. (Allievi) As much as they might be expected to be, these are not always the reasons a woman who marries a Muslim man will convert to Islam herself.

Often times, it is the introduction to Islam via her love interest, or husband that brings her to the acceptance of Islam. It is not always for social reasons, but also, and many times, is because she finds something fulfilling about Islam itself. Perhaps she had never really known about Islam before she met her love interest and in the process of getting to know him, she gets to know Islam, and then ultimately accepts it for herself. (Anway)
 
Acquaintance
Similar to learning about Islam through a significant other, or husband, many women first learn about Islam through a friend, co-worker, fellow student, or colleague. She may find their new Muslim friend to be unusual and will be inquisitive about their religion, maybe even attempt to convert them to her own religion. The best way to prepare for a debate is to know your opponent, and so evangelical Christians looking to convert their new Muslim friend to Christianity start studying the Qur’an in an attempt to become familiar with this other religion and to build arguments against it. What they find occurs during their studies, though, is that they are drawn to Islam and find themselves understanding and even agreeing with what they find in the Qur’an. They find themselves wanting to learn more about Islam and then accept Islam instead of converting their friend. (Nieuwkerk)

Aminah Assilmi converted to
Islam while trying to evangelize
the Muslims in her college drama class.
Even if evangelism is not a motive in learning about Islam, many people who have made a Muslim acquaintance find themselves wanting to learn more. Sometimes it is a pious nature of their Muslim friend that intrigues the non-Muslims. Most times they are surprised by the natures of their new friend – they are nothing like the terrorists of 9/11! When they realize their own ignorance of the religion, they want to learn more in an attempt to understand their friend, co-worker, or colleague better. Again, it is during this exploration that they find something within what they learn that draws them in to an acceptance of Islam. (Haddad)

Quest for Answers
Sometimes, as in the way of acquaintance, converts originally stumbled upon Islam; sometimes it is a quest of knowledge or a quest for answers to what doesn’t make sense that leads converts to Islam. Perhaps it is dissatisfaction for the explanations of certain aspects of the religion they were raised with that leads them on such a quest. These people are naturally inquisitive and don’t rest with an answer that doesn’t make sense to them. They may seek answers in many different religions before settling on Islam. The common report with these converts is that they found that what they read in the Qur’an not only made sense to them logically, but also answered those questions that had long plagued them and that no one else, not even their clergy could answer. (Haddad)

Often the intellectual pursuits come from Christianity. When the trinity or the idea of Jesus as the son of God or as God incarnate don’t make sense, or when bible contradictions are frustrating and the lack of adequate answers even more so, converts find solace in the logic and clearness of the Qur’an. Questions that they felt they would never have answers to, suddenly make sense. Science agrees with religion. Religion agrees with logic. (Anway)
Camilla Leyland, 32, pictured in Western and Muslim dress,
converted to Islam in her mid-20s for 'intellectual and feminist reasons'
Anti-Feminism
Some women in the west are frustrated with the expectations thrust upon them and they see Islam as a way to be a woman and be comfortable in traditional gender roles without feeling like they have let other women down in the quest for equality among men in society. With feminism, often women are expected not only to be women in a traditional sense, or traditional feminine role, but are also now expected to compete with men. In some ways, women are expected to be both men and women, whereas men are only expected to be men. This can be very exhausting and frustrating for women that are perfectly happy to be a mom and a wife or who are tired of expecting to be super-woman all of the time. There is a common idea, a misconception that Islam is anti-feminist. Islam calls for equity between men and women, but does recognize gender differences. It is the fact that Islam allows for these gender differences that sometimes is a draw for women.

Women are cherished in Islam. There is a misconception in the west that Muslim women are oppressed, often because of the Islamic coverings – abaya, hijab, and/or niqab – that many Muslim women wear. Women are revered for being mothers. Women are protected, cared for, and provided for by men in Islam. This can be a very strong draw for women that are tired of being subjected to the common abuses they face in western society. In Islam it is OK to be a stay at home mother who focuses on raising her children properly. She is not looked down upon for not competing with man in the workforce, rather she is protected and provided for because of the important job she has in raising the children to be successful adults. 

Feminism
Although it seems contradictory to the idea many people have - that Islam is anti-feminist, Islam frequently gives women a voice in what is often a man’s world. The Qur’an is specific about the equity between men and women, and was written long before women’s suffrage in America. Women often refer to the fact that being Muslim and wearing hijab and/or abaya makes them more equal with men. The coverings force others to look at them for their minds and abilities rather than their looks. They feel safer and free-er from objectification.

Shaikha Shakina Reinhertz
A particular “brand” of Islam, Sufism, is especially appealing to many feminist types. Sufism gives not only importance to women, but even allows women to be religious leaders. Sufism is mystical, more spiritual and less confined by the “rules” of Sunni or Shi’a Islam. Feminists often like the freedom of expression and teachings that Sufism offers them. (Jawad)

Problem Solving
Some who have studied conversion in the west have suggested that perhaps the conversion to Islam is sometimes a subconscious reaction to societal or personal problems the convert perceives. (Wohlrab-Sahr) Islam gives these converts a way to correct the problems they either have experienced or perceive as problems in society. (Jawad) And converts often embrace Islam because dissatisfaction with western cultural norms as a motivating factor. (Zebiri) For African Americans, Islam is a way to reclaim their identity and to raise political clout. (Simmons) For women who are tired of feminism, it is a way to find peace in the fact that they are OK with traditional gender roles. For women that are tired of the way women are sexualized and objectified in the west, Islam gives them a way to correct what they see as immorality and/or a way to no longer be subjected to objectification and over-sexualization. (Nieuwkerk) For women that have had a hard time feeling like they fit in anywhere, conversion gives them a new start to belong to something and with others.

In many ways, the problem solving that Islam provides is in the form of a new identity for the convert. This can come in the form of a new outer appearance, such as donning the hijab (typically referring to the head covering), or even niqab (face veil). Sometimes the new identity is as extreme as a legal name change to that of a more Islamic name. (Allievi) Even being part of a new community, or Ummah, can be a part of the new identity building process. In some ways, the new identity is a way for the convert to distance herself from something that she considered to be a problem in her previous “life” as a non-Muslim.

So, who are these women that are accepting Islam? Are they poor, uneducated, battered and abused women that are seeking a new identity in a foreign religion? The answers seem to be surprising to popular media and to some researchers. While compiling research for her book, Daughters of Another path, Carol Anway found that over 50% of her respondents held a Bachelor’s degree or higher. During her fieldwork for Women Embracing Islam, Karin van Nieuwkerk found that, “most converts appear to be of middle-class background” and that they have their first experience with Islam in the university setting. It is perhaps the natural inquisitive tendencies that ultimately lead many higher educated women (who are more likely from middle to upper level financial demographics to have had the opportunity to have a higher education in the first place) to find a home in Islam. Conversion to Islam is not exactly an easy process in the west, however. 

Costs / Consequences
The stumbling blocks that many converts run into don’t necessarily make the choice to accept Islam a difficult one, but instead provide for some costs, or consequences in their family and social lives. Due to misconceptions, many times the newly converted woman is confronted with opposition from the people she loves most, her family. (Anway) The misconceptions about Islam that many people in the west hold come mostly from a lack of knowledge about the religion, some from bad examples (e.g. Al-Qaeda), and others from a confusion between culture and religion. Sometimes the family hoped that their daughter/sister/niece was just acting out, trying on a new religion like she was trying on clothes, and hope that like when she was a teenager, it was a “phase” that she would grow out of.

Especially in the wake of 9/11, the families and friends may be concerned that their loved one has gotten involved in terrorism, or worry about how their’ daughter’s choice will reflect on them in the community which they belong. They don’t necessarily see her choice to convert as her own, but that of the family at large. If the new convert chooses to don the hijab or other traditionally Islamic clothing, it can be even harder for others to accept. It is one thing if she changes something inwardly, but wholly another when she makes it obvious to all. One tale of how a parent reacted is given in Carol Anway’s Daughters of Another Path: “They were very upset at first but now they reluctantly accept it. My father got very angry and twisted my arm and told me about my hijab, to ‘take that thing off because I don’t want to be seen with you in public.’”

Sometimes the parents of a convert see her choice as a personal insult, especially if they are particularly religious in the previous faith. They see their daughter’s choice as a slap in the face or an overt rejection. (Jawad) Over time, if the family ties are strong and the convert and the family and friends give each other a chance to see how things will be, they learn that this is a decision that she made – for herself and not “to” anyone. Most times, but not always, a new understanding is found and the relationships continue on in a positive direction.

Relationships with family and friends or within a home community are not the only stumbling blocks that converts come across. They also frequently have to deal with the stigma of being a convert and not a born-Muslim. Sometimes, when they enter the Muslim community, they are not looked upon as serious Muslims by their sisters-in-faith that were born and raised Muslim. Converts can feel scrutinized in the Mosques by the older generation immigrant women and in extreme cases, ostracized. (Haddad) They may struggle to not only be outcast by the society that they came from, but also the one that they were originally so happily joining.

Another way in which converts sometimes struggle with their Ummah, or Muslim community, is that often new converts are akin to born-again Christians. They are very excited about their new found faith and overzealous in not only their adaption of it in their own lives but will critique and correct those around them.  It may be annoying to some born Muslims, who like most people, don’t like to be corrected when they are not following the “rules”. Some of the Ummah, however, may actually be relieved and revived by the spirit of their new sisters. Often new converts have researched Islam more than those that have grown up learning about Islam and can be a source of knowledge about the separation between religion and culture. It can be an avenue of healthy dialogues and the foundation of lasting friendships.

Converts to Islam, especially women converts, play an important role in their Ummah and in their society at large. Converts may or may not be keenly aware of this new role – that of a mediator. The convert is the tie between the west and the “other”. She is one that can help explain the two halves to each other and mediate the conflicts that may or may not erroneously arrive. She may teach her family, friends, and home community about their misconceptions of Islam. She may correct their misunderstandings and foster a new perception about this “foreign” religion. That which is known is far less scary than that which is unknown. She may also be able to help foster a new relationship between the Muslim community and non-Muslims via opportunities for mixing and meeting each other.

Sometimes this new role is realized and not always wanted. It can be scary for the convert to be an example to others. What if she is not a good example? She doesn’t want to give non-Muslims the wrong idea about the faith and she doesn’t want to be scrutinized by her new Muslim community in the same way. She is often times still learning and adapting to her new found faith. Conversion is rarely a phenomenon that lasts only a moment. Converts often convert to Islam slowly and may change their attitudes and adopt different parts or degrees of Islam over time. Sometimes she starts out zealous and then cools down; sometimes she starts out slow and becomes more enraptured over time.

Lastly, a hurdle in the west for the new convert is that of discrimination. In Islam, many women feel that wearing the traditional Islamic coverings like the hijab, abaya, and/or niqab makes them more equal to men as they are judged on their minds and abilities rather than their looks. In the Middle East, this may very well be the case. In America, especially since 9/11 and in the smaller, less urbanized areas, women in traditional dress are more likely to be discriminated against in the workplace than Muslim women that look “like everyone else”. For women that have already been fighting in a man’s world – and maybe have won – to face this new challenge can be extremely difficult. They may be tempted to doff the traditional dress, even if they believe they should wear it, just so they will not be discriminated against. 

Conclusion
Many women in the west have been accepting Islam more and more over the years. The tragedy of 9/11 didn’t seem to slow down this phenomenon, but instead made more people aware of and curious about Islam. The inquisitive individuals who may have had a life filled with questions about their religion or had never found adequate answers or felt a void in their life are attracted to Islam for its logic and simple nature.

Many female converts meet their first Muslim friend at University and sometimes as a significant other. Even if her future husband is her motivation for learning about Islam, it is not by force or coercion that brings her to the faith. Many times, she is the one that brings him back to practicing the faith regularly and with more conviction.

New converts find peace in their decision on one hand, but a struggle on the other. They have to face telling their family and friends about their choice and risk rejection or opposition. They struggle with acceptance within their new Ummah and proving themselves to born-Muslims. They find themselves as an instant mediator between Islam and the west – often working hard to correct misconceptions and spread awareness about True Islam versus the faith of the extremist groups.

These women are not oppressed and come from some of the free-est societies in the world. Sometimes their choice to accept Islam is in a backlash against feminism that has made things more difficult on women – they see how women and mothers are venerated in Islam and they wish for equity but to also be able to live out the gender roles that feel more natural to them. For them, Islam is not only a logical faith that has answered their questions, but allows them to live the identity that they feel most comfortable with.

Bibliography

Allievi, Stefano. "The Shifting Significance fo the Halal/Haram Frontier." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the West. Ed. Karin van Nieukerk. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 120-149.
Anway, Carol L. Daughters of Another Path. Yawna Publications, 1995.
Haddad, Yvonne Yazbeck. "The Quest for Peace in Submission." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the WEst. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 19-47.
Jawad, Haifaa. "Female Conversion to Islam." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the West. Ed. Karin van Nieuwkerk. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 153-171.
Nieuwkerk, Karin van. "Gender, Conversion, and Islam." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the West. Ed. Karin van Nieuwkerk. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 95-119.
Simmons, Gwendolyn Zoharah. "African American Islam as an Expression of Converts' Religious Faith and Nationalist Dreams and Ambitions." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the West. Ed. Karin van Niewkerk. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 172 - 191.
Wohlrab-Sahr, Monkika. "Symbolizing Distance." Women Embracing Islam: Gender and Conversion in the West. Ed. Karin van Nieuwkerk. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006. 71-92.
Zebiri, Kate. British Muslim Converts: Choosing Alternative Lives. Oxford: OneWorld Press, 2008.

Originally written for my Islam class in the spring of 2011